"There's something seriously wrong with an America that constantly re-elects people who all but laugh in your face while squandering taxpayer money. It isn't even real money to them," observes Dan Riehl re Barney Frank's latest comment about "spending your money" for a Detroit bailout: "There's no downside to trying." Barney Frank, above, in a CNBC "Closing Bell" interview October 20 tells Maria Bartiromo "I think there are a lot of rich people out there whom we can tax at a point down the road and recover some of this money."
"Are people buying things where you live?" asks The Barrister at Maggie's, tossing readers a short list of provocative questions about what goes on here in this autumn of our discontent. A few excerpts and then on to our own thoughts and finally — best for last — our favorite answer in the comments at Maggie's:
Is this a hyped-up ordinary recession, with great stock market buys that will make you wealthy in a few years?
Are we headed towards a long global depression?
Is this all an emotional reaction?
Don't ask us, but our gut tells us hype, playing upon our all-too-human emotional reaction to change, is a major player, the stuff of which political and journalistic careers are made and the reason why free markets aren't necessarily free in this "Republic, if you can keep it" of ours. We agree with Rand Simberg in his Pajamas Media essay "Want Change? Let's Try Free Markets," but don't hold your breath:
Joseph Schumpeter famously — and admiringly — wrote about the “creative destruction” inherent in the actions of the free market. I refuse to use the word “capitalism” in this context, because it’s really a Marxist term and doesn’t capture the essence of a system in which individuals and corporations freely exchange goods and services without government interference, if indeed it ever did. When so-called “capitalists” who run the finance, real estate, insurance, and now automotive industries come to Washington, hat in hand, for taxpayer dollars, it’s laughably ludicrous to call them supporters of the free market. Moreover, the term “capitalism” doesn’t capture or connote the importance of property rights and the ability to exchange them freely that are at the base of human liberty in the way that the phrase “free market” does.
In Schumpeter’s view — which is supported abundantly by history — as new technological or financial or cultural innovations arise, or as the societal desires and composition change, so change the markets and business models for existing companies. They have a choice of adapting to that change or, if incapable of doing so for either corporate cultural or other reasons, they can die. They can die, that is, if they don’t have courtiers at the royal court. Then, their options are more varied and they don’t require the necessary and painful change to their ways of doing business that might be required to survive in the new circumstances.
In her seminal book, The Future and its Enemies, Virginia Postrel writes about the real political divide — not left versus right, but what she calls stasists versus dynamists. The former fear change and want to use government power to minimize it, if not eliminate it. The latter accept that improvements in the human condition require change by definition, and understand that the best way to ensure it is to allow individuals the freedom to make choices, with consequences, both good and ill, to be borne by them.
Simberg's pesky "courtiers at the royal court" and the preening, narcissistic Federal Princes they woo bring us back to our above-mentioned favorite answer to the comments at Maggie's, by reader Tom c:
After listening to the Barney Frank committee today one can't help being a little pessimistic. Bloviating, grandstanding, bullying political hacks with little to no understanding of business, economics or the pressures faced by American manufacturers. I wouldn't be looking for leadership from those jokers.
Thank you Tom c for listening to the Barney "The private sector got us into this mess. The government has to get us out of it" Frank committee so we didn't have to. As Jeff Jacoby wrote a couple of months back, "Frank's fingerprints are all over the financial fiasco."
You have described the problem which freedom faces in a most explicit essay. Capitalism is a grossly misused term .Capitalism means using money, capital to provide the means to produce more than an individual can do by himself. All modern nations, be they Socialist, Communist, Dictatorships or Democracies are capitalistic. The big difference is that in a free nation the Capitalism is run by Free Enterprise. Free Enterprise is the most productive and produces more for its citizens. Barney Frank is the antithesis of Free Enterprise. People who elect his type year after year are destroying Free Enterprise and deserve the pain and suffering which awaits them.
Posted by: goomp | November 20, 2008 at 07:28 PM
Excellent essay! I can't even look at Frank; someone else has to do that for me.
OH, and Goomp needs a blog!! :)
Posted by: pam | November 21, 2008 at 07:17 AM
Pam: Goomp emails in response to your comments:
"You do the work of blogging, and I have the fun of commenting. The privilege of old age. What a thrill the Libs will have being able to look at Waxman as well as Barney."
Posted by: Sissy Willis | November 21, 2008 at 08:31 AM
Dear merciful heavens - I may have to stop watching the news altogether. Waxman and Frank are two of the most unlovely creatures on Planet Earth!
goomp - whether you blog or comment, just like Sissy, Tuck, Baby and Tiny - you are a cherished treasure to us all!
HAPPY THANKSGIVING! We're having shrimp, mozzarella and scallop pizza with garlic, basil and heirloom tomato added after it comes out of the oven! Why be traditional when it's only me and the ever lovely Sis Linda?
Posted by: Gayle Miller | November 21, 2008 at 11:21 AM
Barney Frank: Putting the "Blo" in "Bloviating" since 1982!
Posted by: Elisson | November 21, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Barney Frank appears to be under the delusion that he is playing Monopoly with the United States of America. Heaven help us if he manages to get Boardwalk. What the leftist illuminati will do is raise taxes for everyone, no matter how much money you have, no matter how many properties you have: they'll bail out another player at your personal expense, and tell you they're not punishing your success, at the same time.
Posted by: coldwarkid | November 22, 2008 at 12:31 AM
Depression - with people like Barney Frank in charge, it will be a depression. We'll be too busy paying taxes to afford anything else.
So that's why your next post features your very photogenic cats - to counteract the image of Frank.
Posted by: mog | November 22, 2008 at 01:05 AM