Yesterday morning we looked out the window and saw what we first took to be the morning star or the dog star or some such timeless thing. But then we noticed it was moving towards us, and we started to go ballistic, imagining Armageddon was on our doorstep. It turned out to be a major airline plane flying south to north (above), a rare thing in these parts, with Logan Airport just to the east of us, but Tuck reported he'd seen such things from time to time.
"Sissy, actually, I don't think there are any scientists who support Darwin's theory," emails the normally astute John Hinderaker of PowerLine in an eye-popping response to a note we sent the PL boys yesterday following their plug of Mark Steyn's thumbs-up review of Ann Coulter's new book. Here's what we said:
Re the otherwise awesome Ann Coulter, what do you make of her trashing of Darwin's theory of evolution? In my view, it totally undermines her credibility.
Hindrocket's response left our jaw dragging along the floor. We'll probably never recover (just kidding):
They have moved on to other variants of "evolution," but all are, in my opinion, based on faith, not evidence.
We've blogged about the field work and subsequent theoretical thinking of our hero, Charles Darwin, early and often here, of course. "There is a grandeur in this view of life" is one of our own all-time faves. Just as a cat can look at a king -- or in our version, a king can look at a cat -- anyone who's good at one thing can make pronouncements in a field he knows nothing of. But he does so at his own risk, as his credibility is in the balance. It's profoundly disappointing when a person one admires as we do John Hinderaker dismisses Darwin's ideas without anything more than this:
It is striking how much fraud has been committed in support of the concept of evolution, but the fact is, modern science does not support it. This is a big topic which we can't begin to cover here.
"Just because Osama is paranoid doesn't mean the infidel isn't out to get him," we captioned this Photoshopped image of the tormented one back in April of 2004, when we "donned our tin foil hat and came up with a couple of good ones."
Well, yes, in your "opinion." As Allahpundit at HotAir [via Laura Lee Donoho at The Wide Awake Cafe] said re our fellow bloggers who went hysterical over the aborted coming of the 12th Imam earlier this week:
I’ll still read them, but never again with quite the same credulity. That’s how it works, boys.
Credulity can be a problem at anytime, of course. We ourselves have not been above apocalyptic prognostications, and last time we promulgated one, back in April of '04, it got us kudos from the estimable Thomas Lifton of The American Thinker.
Update: Pajamas Media takes note.

















Recent Comments